Toxic attitude

When Fran­cois Roche was invited to make an exhi­bi­tion and give a lec­ture at Sci-Arc, here is what he replied:

Dear

I have no other way than to can­cel the Sci-Arc exhi­bi­tion in the Gallery (sched­uled in May 25) and the lec­ture (sched­uled the April 6 – 2011)
The gap of point of view, and the lack of inter­est for pol­i­tics and atti­tude, reduc­ing the archi­tec­ture process to a unique design agenda can­not fit with our sce­nario of pro­duc­tion and sce­nario of speeches.

Our works and atti­tudes are toxic, ani­mal, dan­ger­ous, regres­sive, politic and com­pu­ta­tional.
Archi­tec­ture is mainly an affair of resis­tance and self-defense, against hypocrisies and “in”voluntary servi­tude, to quote La Boetie. It can­not be reduced to a design goal, exclu­sively ded­i­cated and trapped by tool­ing. I dis­agree on the way the knowl­edge is framed by and for pre­dictable pro­fes­sional, with­out any poten­tial to cor­rupt and desalien­ate through edu­ca­tional pro­ce­dures the “com­ing out” of neo­pla­gia­rism and neo­cop­ism, which remind me the Beaux Art symp­tom and syn­drome. I ‘m French and know per­fectly the stick­i­ness of this sliper­ring addiction.

I just want to pre­cise that this vol­un­tary aban­don, can­not be under­stood as a “tantrum or capric­cio” against the Sci-arc stu­dents pool, but it is at the level of Sci-Arc staff arro­gances and igno­rances, which seems to shrink archi­tec­ture pur­pose to a sim­ple affair of design agenda.

My best
F Roche /
PS Speak­ing and writ­ing are done, here, in my Frenchg­lish dialect / I let you the oppor­tu­nity to trans­late it in the Shake­speare “mayonnaise”.

link to the orig­i­nal R&SIE(n)

Website Pin Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Premium Responsive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Latest Comments

94Maggie

on 12+ h. a day, 6/7 days a week

2017-08-06 12:09:32

Hello admin, i must say you have very interesting content here. Your website can go viral. You need initial traffic boost only. How to get it? Search for; Mertiso's tips go viral

multitude- multitude

on Survey

2015-04-01 13:27:31

[…] the spon­ta­neous responses to the last ques­tion of the sur­vey car­ried out in […]

Conrad Newel

on 12+ h. a day, 6/7 days a week

2015-03-23 18:10:56

@Colt Sievers I will be the first to agree with you on all counts. I would love to read that article. If you ever want to publish it on my blogg please do not hesitate to contact me.

Colt Sievers

on 12+ h. a day, 6/7 days a week

2015-03-23 16:58:10

@Conrad having worked in one of those offices that you mention, I have found your post as much provocative as naive and simplistic. I should make an entire post to explain why... will leave that for later. Thanks, anyway, to keep the discussion alive

Conrad Newel

on 12+ h. a day, 6/7 days a week

2015-03-23 16:45:07

Besides my terrible diction or lack thereof this raises another issue. Should we really feel outrage or sympathy for these interns? After all the ones who can afford to take these kind of jobs are the sons and daughters of the wealthy. What this letter is, is infact symbolic capital and social significance for sale. The rich kid can buy this piece of significance for among other reasons to go to a party and say to his less affluent counterpart, "hey I work for SANAA, or DS+R or whoever. Where do you work again?" Its a status symbol, just like a porsche, or a private jet. Affordable to a selected few that can afford it.